Making Money with Speed and Flexibility
Don
Reinertsen,
Reinertsen &
Associates, Author, Managing the Design Factory and co-author of
Developing Products in Half the Time
Many companies have recognized
that changes late in a product development project are
expensive. They try to avoid such changes by emphasizing
rigorous up front decision-making and highly structured
processes. Unfortunately, these methods can add rigidity to a
development process and have unexpected side effects such as:
- Forcing important decisions to occur before good
information is available.
- Discouraging the use of valuable but still evolving
technologies.
- Delaying work unnecessarily to wait for consensus.
- Substantially increasing effort invested for the sole
benefit of "the process".
This has caused many companies to consider approaches that
focus on carefully balancing the benefits of late changes
against their costs. Companies are increasingly examining
approaches that:
- Defer selected decisions until higher quality information
is available.
- Accelerate the creation of the information needed to make
these decisions.
- Modify process methodologies and product architectures to
make adjustments less painful.
Don Reinertsen will discuss the economic tradeoffs motivating
companies to adopt more flexible development processes. Extreme
process orientation can cause companies to lose their focus on
results. Absence of process can cause companies to keep
repeating the same painful mistakes. Don will examine the middle
path that seeks to combine the benefits of structure and
flexibility.
ABOUT DON
REINERTSEN
Don Reinertsen is President of
Reinertsen & Associates, a consulting firm specializing in the
management of the product development process. Before starting
his own firm, he had extensive consulting experience at McKinsey
& Co. an international management consulting firm, and operating
experience as Senior Vice President of Operations at Zimmerman
Holdings, a private diversified manufacturing company.
His contributions in the
field of product development have been recognized
internationally. In 1983, while a consultant at McKinsey & Co.,
he wrote a landmark article in Electronic Business magazine
which first quantified the value of development speed. This
article has been cited as the McKinsey study that indicated "six
months delay can be worth 33 percent of life cycle profits".
In the past fifteen years,
he has gone considerably beyond this early work. He has worked
with companies ranging from Fortune 500 Baldrige Award winners
to small venture capital backed start-ups. He has developed a
number of innovative analytical techniques for assessing the
product development process, and changing it.
Don holds a B.S. from
Cornell University in Electrical Engineering, and an M.B.A. with
distinction from Harvard Business School. He is a member of the
IEEE, SME, and ASQC. Don is coauthor of the best-selling book
"Developing Products in Half the Time", and author of the book,
"Managing the Design Factory: A Product Developer's Toolkit". He
writes and speaks frequently on techniques for shortening
development cycles, and teaches a popular course at California
Institute of Technology on Streamlining the Product Development
Process. |
Flexibility in New Product Development:
Evidence, Insights and
Obstacles From the Field
Alan
D. MacCormack,
Lumry Family Assistant
Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School
Despite significant advances in our
understanding of how to manage innovation over the past 20
years, our knowledge of this process still seems to lag the
requirements placed upon it by rapidly changing business
environments. It is my belief that much of the
dissatisfaction emerging with firms' efforts to innovate can be
traced to the conventional processes through which they tend to
manage product development - a process founded upon the need for
control and discipline, typically implemented via a series of
stages and gates that are traversed in a sequential manner.
In some business contexts, such a process handcuffs firms into
producing a product that is outdated the day it is released.
In the worst of cases, the product may actually be obsolete.
In my talk, I will present evidence that in uncertain
environments, development flexibility
can be a huge source of advantage in producing a product
that is better matched to evolving customer requirements.
Yet I will also show that flexibility cannot be achieved merely
by reacting ex-post to evolutions in customer demands or new
technologies. Rather, it requires purposeful
investments (in process and organization) to be made
early in development, providing the foundation for a more
evolutionary process of learning and adaptation to occur
throughout a development cycle. This evidence illustrates
the central "paradox" of flexibility - a flexible process
requires significant amounts of structure; however, this
structure is designed to achieve different objectives than in a
more conventional process.
After providing evidence on the performance impact of a more
flexible process, I will break down the key constructs that
underlie such a process, providing examples of how these
constructs have been implemented in a variety of different
industry contexts (e.g., in the software, hardware,
telecommunication, automotive and aerospace industries). I will
then discuss the greatest barriers to adopting flexible
processes, which in my experience, revolve around two major
issues: the perceived trade-offs involved in pursuing
flexibility as opposed to greater efficiency in development; and
the role that senior managers must play in understanding the
foundations of a flexible process, facilitating its
implementation and changing expectations for the information
that is used to monitor (and evaluate) projects.
ABOUT ALAN MACCORMACK
Alan MacCormack is an assistant professor in the Technology and
Operations Management area at the Harvard Business School. His
research explores the management of technology and product
development in rapidly changing environments, such as the
internet software industry and the computer workstation and
server industry. Professor MacCormack's work has appeared in a
number of books and journals, including both the
Harvard Business Review
and
Sloan Management Review.
Before coming to Harvard, he worked for five years as a
management consultant with both
Ernst & Young and
Booz, Allen & Hamilton.
During this time, he focused on manufacturing and operations
related issues for clients in the automotive and aerospace
industries. Professor MacCormack received his D.B.A from the
Harvard Business School
in 1998, where he was a recipient of the George S. Dively Award
for distinguished research. He also holds a Masters degree in
Management from MIT's
Sloan School of Management,
and a B.Sc. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the
University of Bath in England.
Professor MacCormack is currently teaching the MBA required
curriculum course in
Technology and Operations Management. |