Skip to navigation, content

C O N F E R E N C E
Improving R&D Productivity:
How to Link Resource Management to Portfolio Process
March 29-31, 2004 / Atlanta, GA

Case Studies & Featured Presentations


CASE STUDY
Improving Product Development Through Pipeline Management

Paul Aspinwall
Process Architect

IBM

An IBM business unit suffering from projects missing committed launch dates (and revenue shortfalls). Believing that resource overloads, particularly on key people, were a major contributor, the unit invested in a resource management system that integrated product strategy and plans with resource planning. This ensured agreement on the right projects, prioritized allocation of resources, and a management ability to better work through dynamic changes. This case study will discuss the management approach and tools used to get better results.

Key learnings:

  • What are the prerequisites to operational success in resource management?
  • How do you design tools and management systems with checks and balances?

During 35 years with IBM, Paul has been a salesman, market planner, business strategist for software, manager of product forecasting and business planning for software in Europe, manager of technology planning for internal use of IT, manager of systems education, program manager on National Language Support and Information Development, and currently a process architect for IBM's Integrated Product Development process. In 1999, the book "Business Process Engineering" included a chapter he co-authored on "IBM Reengineering from a Development Reengineering Perspective." Paul haspresented on IBM's reengineering efforts at the International Association for Product Development workshops and at Management Roundtable and PDMA events.


CASE STUDY
A Framework for Integrating Resource Management with Critical Decision Making Processes in NPD

Paul_Bunch50.gif (4189 bytes)Paul R. Bunch, PhD
Manager of Capacity Planning and Management
Eli Lilly & Company

In NPD organizations, the resources required to complete all attractive projects exceed the available resource pool. However, Resource Management (RM) in NPD has typically been viewed as something that must be done after other key processes have been completed. For example, Portfolio Management is a cyclical process that helps the organization decide what to work on and how to prioritize its projects. Business Planning is a process in which organizations set functional budgets and headcount targets. Resource management is typically viewed as an operational process in which functional groups decide how to apply their resources to optimize the portfolio output given the portfolio selected from Portfolio Management and given functional budgets. This approach separates what an organization intends to work on from the resources required to complete the work and makes resource management a reactive rather than proactive process.

Resource management is a process that should anticipate resource constraints and inform portfolio managers and business developers of potential resource deficits in time to develop risk management plans. This can provide tremendous benefits to the organization including driving alignment across functions and focusing resources on the critical constraints. This presentation will cover the following key areas:

  • A framework for describing resource management in NPD
  • How resource management can be integrated with Portfolio Management and Business Planning
  • Critical capabilities, tools, and processes required for the integration
  • Case studies describing how resource management processes have been integrated with critical decision making processes in NPD

Paul Bunch works in Lilly Research Laboratories (LRL) as Manager of Capacity Planning and Management. In his current assignment, Paul is involved developing processes and information to integrate capacity information into key decision processes, especially those involving significant resource allocations. Prior to his current assignment, Paul has held several management and technical assignments in Project Management and Discovery research. Most of his work has been focused on the development of decision support systems, capacity management and productivity improvement initiatives. Paul has also held positions in manufacturing, where he focused on implementing planning and scheduling systems to optimize capacity in Lilly’s production facilities.


FEATURED PRESENTATION
Key Pipeline Practices Drive Effective Capacity Management

Bradford L. GoldenseBradford L. Goldense
President

Goldense Group, Inc.

The techniques, touch points, and management steering approaches that companies use for pipeline management have a larger impact on profit and loss than the systems and tools used to manage detailed capacity and scheduling.   Focus on being effective before worrying about being efficient.  Learn how seven practical best pipeline practices improve capacity utilization.  Mastery of the subtleties of ideating, concepting, selecting, balancing, starting, ramping, and obsoleting projects and/or products will improve yield.

Brad Goldense, President of GGI, has been assisting engineering and manufacturing companies for the past twenty years in assessing, developing, and implementing competitive business changes. Mr. Goldense has consulted to over 75 Fortune 1000 companies and has done work in well over 250 manufacturing plants. He specializes in several areas including: strategic planning, reengineering, product development, manufacturing management, and engineering/manufacturing design/information systems. For the past five years, Mr. Goldense has concentrated his efforts in the concurrent engineering and engineering automation areas to reduce cycle times product development and manufacturing functions.


CASE STUDY
How HP Optimizes the Use of Scarce R&D Resources

Michael Menke
Business Strategy & Technology Consultant

Business Innovation & Transformation Services
Hewlett-Packard

&
Ralph Morales
Finance Team Lead

IPG New Business Creation
Hewlett-Packard

Despite spending nearly $4 billion annually on R&D, HP can’t possibly cover all of its fields of business interest. Therefore, one of its core strategies is to innovate where a difference can be made and partner for the rest. Given this approach, how do we determine the best places to focus our scarce resources? The answer is portfolio management. This case study will explore how HP:

  • integrates business portfolio management with investment portfolio management
  • ensures data integrity between planning and investment analysis
  • determines where to focus its limited R&D resources
  • responds quickly and intelligently to unavoidable budget cuts
  • leverages a common portfolio process across all business units
  • improves and extends portfolio management in the future

Portfolio management is fast becoming a process that guides decision-making at the highest levels of the corporation. A case study will show how HP generates high quality inputs for portfolio management in one of the most risky areas, new business creation.


CASE STUDY
Active Business Portfolio Management

Paul D. Ries
Senior Portfolio Manager

Dow Polyurethanes

Actively managing a portfolio requires integrated decision making and business planning.  Among the areas to be considered are business strategy, opportunity analysis and selection, product planning, resource management, financial forecasting, project planning, and performance tracking.   Taking a holistic approach to analyzing the strategic and tactical portfolios is the first step toward managing risks and driving performance.  This presentation will discuss the underlying risks associated with a development portfolio and various techniques for managing them


FEATURED PRESENTATION
Managing the Impact of Portfolio Shifts on Resource Management

Bradford L. GoldensePeter Dierauer
Emerging Technology Leader

Sensing and Control
Honeywell, Inc.

In situations where major portfolio shifts are necessary, such as moving a business from a harvesting to a growth mode, the link between resource management and portfolio management is essential; resource management can be especially difficult and critical for success in this situation. This presentation will cover an example of a drastic portfolio shift and its impact on resource allocation management. Several portfolio and resource management tools that are useful for such instances will be presented and discussed.

Peter Dierauer is the Emerging Technology Leader for Honeywell’s Sensing and Control business unit. He graduated in 1988 from the University Biel/Bienne, Switzerland with a MSEE. He held several positions in Honeywell Europe before he moved to the United States in 1995. Since then he has focused his activities in the Technology Management field. Over the past three years he was involved in the development and deployment of the portfolio management system within a division of Honeywell Control Products. He facilitated the Automotive on Board Product Approval and Portfolio Management Committee and developed and deployed the Automotive Technology Portfolio Management Process. Today, Peter Dierauer is managing the Honeywell Sensing & Control Technology Portfolio.


CASE STUDY
Improving NPD Execution - Resource Capacity Planning and Management

Emery PowellEmery Powell
NPD Manager
Texas Instruments

A primary cause of time to market delays for new product development (NPD) is inadequate management of resource capacity versus the demand, particularly with respect to critical path tasks on a project's schedule.

Marketing and sales are driven by the desire to capture every new product opportunity they find. Management is driven by the desire to increase NPD throughput, release as many new products as possible, and capture the revenue. The typical response to these needs is to rapidly feed new product opportunities into the pipeline. The expectation is: More IN = More OUT. Yet, exceeding throughput capacity all too often leads to a clogged pipeline.  So how can we manage NPD capacity 3, 6, or 12 months in the future? How can we know what the critical path demand is for a particular type of resource or for a single resource, months in advance when NPD is inherently a highly variable environment? How can we measure and assess the impact of the resource demand and our capacity constraints on execution success? 

Enterprise and portfolio level tools that can provide this management capability are now available for new product development. This presentation will present the on-going status and findings of recent pilots effort to use these types of tools in Texas Instruments, the implementation difficulties, and the preliminary improvement gains.

Emery is currently the New Product Development Manager for one of Texas Instrument's billion dollar businesses. Previous experiences related to this presentation have included the merger and integration of the NPD capability of multiple large businesses, and large scale cycle time, six sigma, project management, and enterprise performance management improvement initiatives. He has managed many R&D and NPD Projects over his career for multiple companies, and he has been a principle in launching two new companies.


CASE STUDY
Dynamically Optimizing Global Resources

Bill Branan
Director of Strategy
Global Subscriber Products
Motorola, Inc.

In our global, constantly changing, environment it is difficult to efficiently manage resources and projects across changing priorities, timelines, multiple locations and multiple business units. The use of common processes and tools, consistently and frequently applied, in both early and late stages of project selection and development enable an objective framework for ensuring the portfolio of projects best aligns both with business strategy and resource availability. This paper will discuss the nature and types of processes and tools which not only facilitate this alignment, but which also earned the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award.

Bill Branan is currently Director of Strategy for the Motorola Commercial Government and Industrial Solutions Sector (CGISS), Global Subscriber Product Division. He is responsible for global technology planning and coordination. Bill has held increasingly responsible positions in Product Development Engineering, Manufacturing, Advanced Technology Development, and Marketing. He is a Motorola distinguished innovator with 17 U.S. Patents. He earned a BSE from University of Central Florida and a MBA from University of Miami.


CASE STUDY
Evolving Processes and Tool-sets to Drive Resource Allocation and Portfolio Management Decisions

Clinton J. Wolfe
Global Program Manager
IMS Health

This presentation will give an overview of IMS Health’s evolution of Resource and Knowledge Management processes and supporting tool-sets within its Product Development Organization. The presenters will discuss their maturation from tracking simple inventories of skill sets and current projects assigned to forecasting/assigning resource allocations across 1-24 months, and tracking resources across multiple projects. They will address the critical inter-dependencies between resource management and portfolio, project and finance management, resource management and the importance of resource management across the entire cross-functional enterprise. They will also provide an overview of their evolving tool-sets (from a paper-based, Access-supported system on a single desktop, to a homegrown web-based interface and now exploring the potential benefits of an off-the-shelf tool).

Take-aways:

  • The importance of creating process before adopting tool-sets
  • The benefits of starting with skills inventories as the "lowest common denominator" for resource decisions & allocations
  • The value of allowing the resource perspective to drive critical budget planning cycles
  • Strategies to integrate and align resource management with portfolio, project and financial management
  • The critical underlying role that the resource management function plays in ensuring that all stakeholders to resource decisions are on the same page

Clint Wolfe has been with IMS Health for nearly four years, focusing on process design and improvement. The resource management processes Clint refined at IMS Health in the US mapped as corporate best practice through a 2002 external benchmarking study. He is currently managing a global program through which IMS is leveraging best practices to standardize process in the areas of resource, project, portfolio and metrics management in five major regions around the world.