Highlights from last year's conference:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0ab5/e0ab506e428cf875867d40a410ade80290aa94da" alt=""
“Excellent forum to
meet people from the industry and FDA in a relaxed setting.”
Russ Davies, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Systems,
Smiths Medical, NA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e847/3e8473e9dc5d094537b4f47fd7a87a1f4f3d5015" alt=""
“This conference was very
enlightening, especially in trends regarding quality.”
Bob Jaksih, Director of Technical Services, Perkins Electronics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd33b/dd33b97933e831a63eca80fa4b4d2e200e859c03" alt=""
“...the
FDA’s list of
recalled devices
that could pose serious health problems or death
has grown over the last five years, with 18 so far this
year...”.
—
The Boston Globe,
September 1, 2004 |
|
Pre-Conference
Workshops:
Tuesday, April 5
BACK BY
POPULAR DEMAND! -- |
Pre-Conference Workshop A
- AM Half-Day Session
CAPA - Management
and Executive Responsibility
INSTRUCTOR:
John Malloy
[BIO]
President
John Malloy and Associates, Inc.
|
Here’s what
participants at the inaugural Med Device Quality Congress said
about John Malloy and why we’ve expanded the length and depth of
his presentation…
-
Great! Not enough time!
-
Excellent examples from when
John was an FDA investigator
-
This presentation was
fantastic. I wish he had a longer time to speak.
-
Excellent talk. I believe this
could be a 1.2 day talk.
-
Best presenter of the seminar!
-
Excellent presentation.
Speaker was extremely knowledgeable of the topic
-
Very informative and well
presented
-
Understanding Software Validation
-
Defining the scope
-
Understanding impact to the
business
-
Understanding the
Systems-Engineering perspective
-
Developing and Maintaining an
Applications Portfolio
-
Assessing the need for
validation
-
Defining a risk-based approach
to prioritize validation efforts
-
Identifying the impact of 21
CFR Part 11 on the validation efforts
-
Implementing a robust validation methodology
-
Using a life cycle approach
-
Defining the essential set of
supporting processes and procedures
-
Evaluating cost and resource
requirements
-
Developing
a cost-effective approach to execution
-
Performing Gap Assessments
-
Using the Six-Sigma Approach
for Problem Solving
-
Identifying the hidden costs
in Remediation
-
Implementing corrective and
preventive measures
-
Monitoring for effectiveness
|
Presented by:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac83/0ac83bbc6f310d88cea8bb74a5f0050408e7f1c8" alt=""
&
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84103/84103dee6f02a5651814111b34900cd968793a65" alt=""
|
|